Prepare a request to correct or interpret an award
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the award and the error or omission identified by the lawyer, list whether it is a correction, an interpretation or an additional award, and the day count in the applicable article. The tool does not write the request.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether the article allows the request, whether the parties agreed to interpretation, and writes the request.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the award and the error or omission identified by the lawyer, list whether it is a correction, an interpretation or an additional award, and the day count in the applicable article. The tool does not write the request. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Separate a correction, an agreed interpretation, and an additional award. The periods are not the same.
- Count 30 days from receipt of the award for the request, unless the parties agreed another period. Count the tribunal time from the request, or from the date of the award for its own correction.
- The lawyer writes the request and gives notice to the other party. The tool does not.
- Diaries of set-aside time, and maps of the grounds for refusing enforcement of a foreign award, are separate tasks.
Sources
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.