Diarise the correction, interpretation and set-aside time limits after an award
Key facts
- Human involvement
- GreenLawyer review
- How AI is used
- From the award and the record of when and how each party received it, calculate the 30-day period to request correction or interpretation, the three-month period to apply to set aside, and any rules-based periods, and populate the firm’s validated post-award diary template.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer confirms the date of receipt from the record (not the date on the award), checks whether a correction request changes the start date, and confirms every diary entry.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the award and the record of when and how each party received it, calculate the 30-day period to request correction or interpretation, the three-month period to apply to set aside, and any rules-based periods, and populate the firm’s validated post-award diary template. |
| Lawyer | The lawyer confirms the date of receipt from the record (not the date on the award), checks whether a correction request changes the start date, and confirms every diary entry. |
Checklist
- Confirm the date each party received the award from the delivery record.
- Check whether an art 33 request has been made and how it affects the three-month period.
- Confirm the diary entries are set for the responsible lawyer and a second person.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correction, interpretation and set-aside times after a Model Law award | Checklist | AI use Yellow | Diary of the Model Law article 33 and article 34 times, and the section 19 public-policy grounds, after an award in a Model Law arbitration. |
| Federal Court Form 58: originating application to enforce an award under section 35(4) of the International Arbitration Act 1974 | Form | AI use Yellow | Link to Federal Court Form 58, the originating application to enforce an award under section 35(4) of the International Arbitration Act 1974, rule 28.49. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.