List whether a party went on without a written objection
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the procedural history, list the rule the party knew had not been complied with, and whether the party then went on with the arbitration without stating an objection in writing. Do not decide that the right to object was lost.
- What the lawyer must review
- You decide whether Rule R-42 applies to the step on the file. Rule R-42 says that any party who proceeds with the arbitration after knowledge that any provision or requirement of these Rules has not been complied with, and who fails to state an objection in writing, shall be deemed to have waived the right to object. The opened sentence is about a provision or requirement of these Rules. It does not say that going on waives every objection to a term of the arbitration agreement. 9 U.S.C. § 2 makes a written agreement adopting the rules enforceable. It is not itself a waiver rule. Rule R-54(a) is a different point: no judicial proceeding by a party relating to the subject matter of the arbitration shall be deemed a waiver of the right to arbitrate.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.