Compare produced documents with a request in the arbitration
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Compare the documents produced with each request. List requests that are unanswered, and record whether the request is for documents the responding party has and intends to rely on, or for other documents in that party's possession or custody that are not otherwise readily available and are said to be relevant and material. Do not decide an objection.
- What the lawyer must review
- You decide any objection and any application to the court. Rule R-23 lets the arbitrator require an exchange of documents in a party's possession or custody on which that party intends to rely, updates of that exchange, and a response to reasonable requests for documents in the responding party's possession or custody that are not otherwise readily available, and that are reasonably believed to exist and to be relevant and material to disputed issues. Electronic documents are produced in the form most convenient and economical for the party who has them, unless the arbitrator finds good cause for another form. Rule R-24 lets the arbitrator make orders to enforce Rules R-22 and R-23, including confidentiality conditions, search parameters, cost allocation, and, for willful non-compliance, adverse inferences, exclusion, special cost allocations, or an interim award of costs. A different step is 9 U.S.C. § 7. The arbitrators, or a majority, may summon a person in writing to attend and, in a proper case, to bring a book, record, document, or paper deemed material. If that person refuses or neglects to obey, a petition to the United States district court for the district in which the arbitrators, or a majority, are sitting may compel attendance or punish for contempt in the same manner as for a court witness. That petition is not a general order for document production, and it is not a decision on an objection.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm that the actual tool, feature and processing terms permit use of this information, including access, retention, training and disclosure conditions.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.