Identify the New Zealand tribunal or High Court review path
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Extract the decision-maker, the date of decision and the statute named on the decision.
- What the lawyer must review
- Do not use the ART
- Identify the tribunal the Act names (IPT, Taxation Review Authority and others)
- Otherwise use High Court judicial review
- Use the Official Information Act 1982 for official information
- Written for / version
- New Zealand versionNZ
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes organising research leads and extracting and organising information. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.