Set a process for a person to challenge a decision the system made or informed

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the decisions the system makes or informs, draft the steps a person would follow to challenge the use of the system or the outcome. Align the steps with guardrail 7, which says organisations should have processes for people affected to challenge use or outcomes. Do not decide whether a statutory review right also exists.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer decides the real path: internal challenge, a privacy complaint, a statutory review, or more than one. The lawyer approves the process before it is offered to people affected.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the decisions the system makes or informs, draft the steps a person would follow to challenge the use of the system or the outcome. Align the steps with guardrail 7, which says organisations should have processes for people affected to challenge use or outcomes. Do not decide whether a statutory review right also exists.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Separate the voluntary guardrail 7 process from any statutory review or privacy complaint the lawyer identifies.
  2. Confirm the process names how a person is told of the outcome and how a human decision-maker is reached.
  3. Confirm the draft does not promise a remedy the lawyer has not identified.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions