Draft a privacy-impact or algorithmic-impact assessment for the system
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Structure an impact assessment from the system description: flows, affected people, risks, mitigations and sign-off questions.
- What the lawyer must review
- Check the flow map matches the actual system
- Do not sign off a generic template
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Structure an impact assessment from the system description: flows, affected people, risks, mitigations and sign-off questions. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Record that a person reviewed an automated output | Form | AI use Yellow | Short record that a named person reviewed one automated output before anyone acted on it, what they checked, and whether they departed from it. |
| Reassessment when a model, purpose or provider changes | Checklist | AI use Yellow | Checklist for when the model, the purpose, the data or the provider of a decision system changes, asking which earlier conclusions have to be made again and by whom. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.