Advise on a client’s automated decision system under EEOC and Colorado ADMT sources
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Map the system to hiring, credit, housing or other consequential decisions and to developer vs deployer.
- What the lawyer must review
- Apply the EEOC position: discrimination laws cover AI in employment decisions
- Check Colorado SB26-189 duties, which start 1 January 2027
- Do not certify 'compliance' from a generated checklist
- Written for / version
- United States versionUSNZ
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.