Standards

ISO 42001 and ISO 27001 for law firms

What the two management-system standards ask of a firm, the difference between aligned and certified, and what certification costs and takes in Australia.

MaintainedWe keep this page up to date.Last reviewed

What the two standards are

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 sets out an AI management system: the policies, roles, risk checks and records an organisation uses to govern its use of AI. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 does the same for information security.

Neither is law. A firm needs a certificate only if a contract, a client or a regulator asks for one. See the framework pages for ISO/IEC 42001 and ISO/IEC 27001.

One system can cover both

Both standards use ISO’s harmonized structure: the same clause numbers and core text in clauses 4 to 10. So a firm can run one integrated system, with one set of policies, one risk register and one internal audit.

Each standard adds its own list of controls in Annex A. 27001 has 93 security controls in 4 themes. 42001 has 38 AI controls under 9 objectives, such as impact assessment, data provenance and intended use.

More detail: what each clause asks forExpand for more
Clauses 4 to 10 in ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 42001
ClauseBoth standardsExtra in 42001
4 ContextIssues, interested parties and the scope of the system.Also the firm’s role with AI: user, provider or producer.
5 LeadershipLeadership commitment, a policy and assigned roles.The policy is an AI policy.
6 PlanningRisk assessment, risk treatment and a Statement of Applicability against Annex A.Adds an AI system impact assessment (6.1.4).
7 SupportResources, competence, awareness, communication and records.Same.
8 OperationRun the risk assessment and treatment at planned intervals.Also repeat the impact assessment (8.4).
9 Performance evaluationMonitoring, internal audit and management review.Same.
10 ImprovementFix nonconformities and keep improving.Same.

The clause summary follows the NIST crosswalk and secondary sources. The Annex A counts come from Secureframe and RiskProfs. ISO texts are sold, not free: check the wording against a purchased copy before an audit.

ISO/IEC 42005:2025 gives guidance on doing an AI impact assessment. It cannot be certified against. Source: ISO.

More detail: there is no “ISO 40001”Expand for more

No ISO or ISO/IEC 40001 management-system standard exists. ISO’s catalogue page numbered 40001 is a cinematography standard about 65 mm film. Source: ISO catalogue.

The AI management standard is ISO/IEC 42001. Source: ISO.

Aligned or certified

A firm can follow a standard without being certified to it. The difference is who checks the work, and what the firm may then say about it.

Aligned with a standard compared with certified to it
AlignedCertified
Who checks itNobody outside the firm. It is a self-declaration.An accredited certification body audits the management system.
Certificate or markNone.A certificate valid for 3 years, with yearly surveillance audits.
What the firm can say"Designed in line with ISO/IEC 42001" or "aligned with ISO/IEC 27001"."Certified to ISO/IEC 42001", naming the certification body and the scope.
Cash costLow: staff time, and buying copies of the standards.Audit fees each year, and often consultant or tooling costs.

A certification body follows ISO/IEC 17021-1. For 42001 it must also meet ISO/IEC 42006:2025. Only certificates from an accredited body carry weight, so check the body on the accreditation body’s register (JAS-ANZ in Australia and New Zealand, UKAS in the UK, ANAB in the US).

How certification works

  1. Define the scope: which offices, systems and uses of AI the management system covers.
  2. Put the management system in place and run it for some weeks.
  3. Hold an internal audit and a management review.
  4. Stage 1 audit: the certification body reviews the documents and readiness, often remotely.
  5. Stage 2 audit: the certification body checks the system works in practice.
  6. The certificate is issued. It is valid for 3 years.
  7. Surveillance audits in years 1 and 2.
  8. Recertification audit in year 3.

Source: Cloud Security Alliance. Under IAF MD 11 one integrated audit can cover 27001 and 42001 together, with less audit time than two separate audits.

More detail: accredited certification bodies for 42001Expand for more
  • Intertek (which owns the former SAI Global) gained global JAS-ANZ accreditation for 42001 on 30 July 2025. Intertek release.
  • BSI was the first body accredited by UKAS and RvA for 42001, in November 2025, and gained ANAB accreditation in March 2026. BSI (UKAS), BSI (ANAB).

This list is not complete. Check any body on the accreditation register before you engage it.

Cost and time in Australia

For a small firm, estimates for a first year of 27001 alone run from about A$15k–30k to A$25k–80k. For 42001 with a narrow scope they are about A$23k–55k. One integrated audit of both takes less audit time than two separate audits, and a certificate takes about 4 to 18 months.

More detail: cost and time, item by itemExpand for more
Estimated cost and time for a small Australian organisation
ItemISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 42001Source
First-year total, small organisationA$15k–30k (one source); A$25k–80k (another), under 20 staffUS$15k–35k for under 50 staff with a narrow scope (about A$23k–55k)CertBetter, High Table, CertPro
Certification body day rate in AustraliaA$1,800–3,200 plus GSTSimilarFOIT
Stage 1 and Stage 2 auditsA$2.5k–9kUS$5k–20kFOIT, Konfirmity
Consultant (optional)A$15k–40k, or A$1.5k–2.2k a dayNo separate figure foundFOIT
Surveillance audit each yearA$1.2k–3.5k a visit20–40% of the first audit feeFOIT, CertPro
Time to certificate6–18 months4–12 months in Australia; 6–12 months from scratchFOIT, GlobalCert International, CertBetter
Saving on 42001 if 27001 is already held—30–50% (vendor claim)GlobalCert International

42001 figures in US$ were converted at an assumed rate of about A$1.55 to US$1.

What law firms are doing

  • Clayton Utz became the first Australian law firm certified to ISO 42001, on 9 June 2026. Clayton Utz media release.
  • K&L Gates was among the first law firms certified globally, in March 2026. Mondaq.
  • KPMG Australia was certified by BSI in October 2024. BSI Australia.

Firms that are not certified can still expect questions about AI governance in panel tenders and client security questionnaires. An aligned system, with a policy, a register of AI tools and impact assessments, gives the firm documents to answer them.

How the standards meet Australian rules

  • Privacy Act. Since 11 December 2024, APP 11’s “reasonable steps” expressly include technical and organisational measures. 27001’s controls are a natural way to show them. MinterEllison.
  • Automated decisions. From 10 December 2026 privacy policies must explain some uses of automated decision-making. 42001’s impact assessment and disclosure controls help. HWL Ebsworth.
  • Government guidance. The Guidance for AI Adoption (October 2025) replaced the Voluntary AI Safety Standard. Both are voluntary and line up broadly with 42001.
  • The profession. Court practice notes such as NSW SC Gen 23 and the regulators’ joint statement set duties for AI use. A firm’s 42001 controls on intended use and disclosure are where it records how it meets them.
More detail: Guidance for AI Adoption practices against 42001Expand for more
The six practices in the Guidance for AI Adoption and the parts of ISO/IEC 42001 they broadly match
PracticeISO/IEC 42001
Decide who is accountableClause 5 (leadership) and A.3 (internal organisation)
Understand impacts and plan accordingly6.1.4 and A.5 (AI system impact assessment)
Measure and manage risks6.1.2 and 6.1.3 (AI risk assessment and treatment)
Share essential informationA.8 (information for interested parties)
Test and monitorA.6.2.4 to A.6.2.6 (verification, deployment, operation) and clause 9
Maintain human controlA.9 (use of AI systems)

This is our own broad mapping. No official crosswalk between the Australian guidance and 42001 was found. Sources: Guidance for AI Adoption, Voluntary AI Safety Standard.

A practical path for a firm

  1. Adopt an AI policy and name who is accountable for it. Start from the law firm AI policy guide.
  2. Keep a register of the AI tools the firm uses, and what each may be used for.
  3. Assess the risk and impact of each tool before staff use it on client work.
  4. Record which Annex A controls apply, and why, in a Statement of Applicability.
  5. Run an internal audit and a management review once a year.
  6. Seek certification when a client, tender or insurer needs the certificate.

Sources and limits

This is general information, not legal advice. ISO standards are sold, and iso.org could not be read automatically. Clause and annex details come from ISO catalogue pages, the NIST crosswalk and secondary sources: check them against purchased copies.

All sourcesExpand for more