Court AI practice notes

LPBT Update - Mediation and Generative AI viewed through a regulatory lens

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania (Regulator), Tasmania.

About this rule

Issuer: Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
Body type: Regulator
Type: Regulator statement
Date: 29 May 2025
Date basis: 2025-05-29
Date on the page: 2025-05-29
Confidence: High
Jurisdiction: Tasmania

Summary

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania update (published by the Law Society of Tasmania, May 2025) setting out the Board's regulatory view of GenAI risks and expectations for practitioners.

Points recorded from the source

Practitioners remain responsible for legal services whether or not GenAI is used; all professional duties still apply
Risks include unreliable or wrong outputs (hallucinations), bias, confidentiality and privacy
Comply with court and regulator guidelines and professional rules; review all GenAI outputs for accuracy
Establish, maintain and regularly review documented workplace policies and internal controls

Verify note

Hosted on the Law Society of Tasmania site; authored by the Board (May 2025).

Source

Read the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania source: LPBT Update - Mediation and Generative AI viewed through a regulatory lens

See it in the AI rules tracker by Australian court and body Tasmania page