Court AI practice notes
AI and Ethical Billing: Law Practices Navigating New Challenges
Law Society of Tasmania (Law society), Tasmania.
About this rule
- Issuer
- Law Society of Tasmania
- Body type
- Law society
- Type
- Article
- Date
- Date not stated
- Date on the page
- 2024-08-21
- Confidence
- Medium
- Jurisdiction
- Tasmania
Summary
Law Society of Tasmania article on billing for AI-assisted work, drawing on ABA Formal Opinion 512 and Australian law society resources.
Points recorded from the source
- Lawyers may charge for time using AI and reviewing outputs but not for learning to use AI tools (ABA view)
- AI costs should generally be treated as overhead
- Points to QLS Guidance Statement No 37 and the QLS AI policy template
Verify note
Date from page timestamp (2024-08-21).
Source
See it in the AI rules tracker by Australian court and bodyTasmania page