Court AI practice notes

Legal Services Regulatory Dialogue (UK-Australia) Report, 1 July 2026 - legal technology and AI

Legal Services Council (Regulator), Commonwealth.

About this rule

Issuer: Legal Services Council
Body type: Regulator
Type: Regulator report
Date: 1 July 2026
Date basis: 2026-07-01
Date on the page: 2026-07-01
Confidence: Medium
Jurisdiction: Commonwealth

Summary

Report of the UK-Australia Legal Services Regulatory Dialogue, published by the Legal Services Council, with a section on legal technology and AI comparing regulator, professional-body and court responses in both countries.

Points recorded from the source

Notes rapidly rising use of generative AI by lawyers in the UK and Australia
Summarises the NSW Law Society, LPBWA and VLSB+C joint statement that AI cannot substitute for legal knowledge and must be verified
Notes QLS-led multi-state guidance on AI selection and use
Observes common themes in Australian court practice notes (confidentiality, limits on AI in affidavits, citation verification, expert reports)

Verify note

Joint dialogue report; Legal Services Council is the publisher on this URL, not the sole author.

Source

Read the Legal Services Council source: Legal Services Regulatory Dialogue (UK-Australia) Report, 1 July 2026 - legal technology and AI

See it in the AI rules tracker by Australian court and body Commonwealth page