Provisional answer
This is general information drawn from published catalogue guidance and stored court notes. It is not legal advice, and it is not a decision that you may use the tool.
Draft conciliation or hearing submissions for the employment tribunal with A general chatbot like ChatGPT, High Court of Australia.
Draft conciliation or hearing submissions for the employment tribunal requires verification against the underlying sources. The lawyer checks accuracy, meaning and omissions before relying on the work.
The matched instrument is No High Court AI practice note was listed on the Law Society of New South Wales index as at 14 May 2026 (High Court of Australia).
If no AI note is published, verify every citation in an official report or authorised source and do not invent a disclosure clause from another court.
Court note
Verify every authority in a report or official source.
Court note
Record the date of the check.
Court note
A general chatbot like ChatGPT is not a named catalogue product. This check has no record of a closed environment, an Australian hosting region, or a training setting for it.
This check
No stored sentence in the matched instrument states a disclosure duty for this task. Open the instrument before you assume there is none.
No High Court AI practice note was listed on the Law Society of New South Wales index as at 14 May 2026. High Court of Australia. The stored note does not give a commencement date. Confirm it on the instrument.
Do the full assessment and save a work record
This opens the full assessment for this task. If it has a state or territory version, you choose that next. The tool and the forum are noted on that screen. This check does not file a separate decision.
See suggested levels for this task
Suggested levels are the three scores. That page is not saved, and it is not a decision record. The task, the tool and the court are carried across when this check has them.
