This is general information drawn from published catalogue guidance and stored court notes. It is not legal advice, and it is not a decision that you may use the tool.
Draft written submissions from the evidence table with A general chatbot like ChatGPT, Planning and Environment Court and Land Court of Queensland.
Draft written submissions from the evidence table requires verification against the underlying sources. The lawyer checks accuracy, meaning and omissions before relying on the work.
The matched instrument is Each court’s own accuracy direction, linked from the Queensland Courts AI page (Planning and Environment Court and Land Court of Queensland).
Verification
These courts have published their own accuracy directions.
Court note
Verify every reference against a source you trust.
Court note
Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
Task catalogue
Confidentiality and client data
A general chatbot like ChatGPT is not a named catalogue product. This check has no record of a closed environment, an Australian hosting region, or a training setting for it.
This check
Disclosure
No stored sentence in the matched instrument states a disclosure duty for this task. Open the instrument before you assume there is none.
Matched rules
Queensland Planning and Environment Court and Land Court AI directions
Each court’s own accuracy direction, linked from the Queensland Courts AI page. Planning and Environment Court and Land Court of Queensland. The stored note does not give a commencement date. Confirm it on the instrument.
This opens the full assessment for this task. If it has a state or territory version, you choose that next. The tool and the forum are noted on that screen. This check does not file a separate decision.
Suggested levels are the three scores. That page is not saved, and it is not a decision record. The task, the tool and the court are carried across when this check has them.