AI LAWFRAMEWORK

Provisional answer

Caution: check these rules first

This is general information drawn from published catalogue guidance and stored court notes. It is not legal advice, and it is not a decision that you may use the tool.

Draft written submissions from the evidence table with A general chatbot like ChatGPT, District Court of Queensland.

Draft written submissions from the evidence table requires verification against the underlying sources. The lawyer checks accuracy, meaning and omissions before relying on the work.

The matched instrument is District Court Practice Direction 12 of 2025 (District Court of Queensland).

Verification

  • The District Court has its own 2025 accuracy direction.

    Court note

  • Do not file while a reference has been checked only by the tool that drafted it.

    Court note

  • Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.

    Task catalogue

Confidentiality and client data

  • Read Guidance Statement No. 37 before client material is uploaded.

    Court note

  • A general chatbot like ChatGPT is not a named catalogue product. This check has no record of a closed environment, an Australian hosting region, or a training setting for it.

    This check

Disclosure

No stored sentence in the matched instrument states a disclosure duty for this task. Open the instrument before you assume there is none.

Matched rules

Do the full assessment and save a work record

This opens the full assessment for this task. If it has a state or territory version, you choose that next. The tool and the forum are noted on that screen. This check does not file a separate decision.

See suggested levels for this task

Suggested levels are the three scores. That page is not saved, and it is not a decision record. The task, the tool and the court are carried across when this check has them.