Letter · Privacy, Data Protection & Cyber

Response to a direct marketing opt-out or source request (APP 7.6 and 7.7)

Standard replies for an organisation that receives a request to stop direct marketing, to stop using or disclosing information to facilitate others’ marketing, or to name the source of the information: no charge, given effect within a reasonable period, and a handling record.

Kind
Letter. A letter or email you adapt and send.
Where it applies
Australia
AI use
Green AI can do most of the drafting. A lawyer still reviews the result.
Law stated as at
18 October 2026
Status
Maintained. Checked on 18 October 2026 against the 2 authorities it cites, for Australia.
Version
1
Source
Written for this library

When to use it

Use when an individual asks an organisation to stop sending direct marketing, to stop sharing their information for other organisations’ marketing, or to say where it got their details. Check first whether the Spam Act 2003, the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 or another law listed in APP 7.8 applies instead.

Used for these tasks

Each task page says how far AI may help with the task and what the lawyer must review.

How AI may be used

With these replies settled by the firm, AI may pick the right reply, fill it from the request and the marketing system records, and log it; the privacy officer checks each source statement and any refusal to name a source.

AI may

  • Classify the request as an opt-out, a do-not-share request, a source request or a combination
  • Fill the reply from the request and the CRM or marketing list records, including the source recorded for the individual
  • Record the request, the date given effect and the systems updated in the log

AI must not

  • Must not decide that naming the source is impracticable or unreasonable
  • Must not charge, or ask the individual to justify the request
  • Must not tell the individual their details have been removed until every marketing system and list provider has been updated

The lawyer checks

  • The opt-out has been applied across all channels and lists, including lists shared with other organisations, within a reasonable period
  • The source named matches the organisation’s records; any decision not to name it is recorded with reasons
  • Whether the Spam Act, the Do Not Call Register Act or another APP 7.8 law applies to the channel has been checked

Method: how the Green, Yellow and Red levels are decided. This is guidance for planning, not legal advice.

Authorities

Read the full text

More in Privacy, Data Protection & Cyber

All precedents for Privacy, Data Protection & Cyber · Tasks and AI use in this area