Check the Tasmanian, ACT or NT Supreme Court index before assuming an AI practice…
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Compare the court's practice-direction index with the filing checklist for an estate proceeding.
- What the lawyer must review
- On 10 October 2026 the Tasmanian practice directions index, the ACT Supreme Court practice directions list and the Northern Territory current practice directions list did not include an AI direction. That check is not a permission to use AI, and it does not replace the solicitor conduct rules. Open the current index again before relying on it. The Tasmanian technology direction from 2019 and the Northern Territory information-technology direction from 2002 were not opened. The Northern Territory expired-directions page was not fetched.
The work product
Forum. Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory
Produce. Check the Tasmanian, ACT or NT Supreme Court index before assuming an AI practice direction
Have ready. Supreme Court of Tasmania practice directions; ACT Supreme Court practice directions; Supreme Court of the Northern Territory practice directions; The matter instructions and the documents the output will rely on..
Example of the limit. Stop before the result is filed, sent or relied on. On 10 October 2026 the Tasmanian practice directions index, the ACT Supreme Court practice directions list and the Northern Territory current practice directions list did not include an AI direction. That check is not a permission to use AI, and it does not replace the solicitor conduct rules. Open the current index again before relying on it. The Tasmanian technology direction from 2019 and the Northern Territory information-technology direction from 2002 were not opened. The Northern Territory expired-directions page was not fetched.
Stop and hand it back when
- The cited source is not the instrument that applies to this forum or this date.
- The output states a fact, date, citation, figure or commitment that is not in the instructions or the source.
- The responsible lawyer has not approved the exact output for its intended use.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-10.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Compare the court's practice-direction index with the filing checklist for an estate proceeding. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Open the cited source and confirm it is the current instrument for this forum and this date.
- On 10 October 2026 the Tasmanian practice directions index, the ACT Supreme Court practice directions list and the Northern Territory current practice directions list did not include an AI direction. That check is not a permission to use AI, and it does not replace the solicitor conduct rules. Open the current index again before relying on it. The Tasmanian technology direction from 2019 and the Northern Territory information-technology direction from 2002 were not opened. The Northern Territory expired-directions page was not fetched.
- Compare the output with the source and the instructions, including material the output left out.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact output for its intended use, or sends it back.
Sources
- Supreme Court of Tasmania practice directions · 2026-10-10
- ACT Supreme Court practice directions · 2026-10-10
- Supreme Court of the Northern Territory practice directions · 2026-10-10
Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.