Prepare an information request for a return position or ruling
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Map the available facts to the ruling or return checklist the lawyer has selected and draft a request for the missing documents.
- What the lawyer must review
- Send only the questions that change the analysis
- Do not let the tool invent a scheme
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Map the available facts to the ruling or return checklist the lawyer has selected and draft a request for the missing documents. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Client information request and facts declaration for a private ruling application or return position | Letter | AI use Yellow | Letter asking a client for the facts and documents needed for a private ruling application (or a contentious return position), with a facts checklist, a supporting documents list, and the written declaration an agent must hold that the information is true and correct. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.