Check a common-property rights by-law for owner consent before it is made
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the motion and the proposed text, list each lot on which the by-law would confer a right or special privilege, and whether a written consent from that owner is in the papers. The tool does not draft or amend the by-law.
- What the lawyer must review
- The lawyer decides whether the consent and the resolution are sufficient before the by-law is treated as made. Only the New South Wales section was opened.
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | From the motion and the proposed text, list each lot on which the by-law would confer a right or special privilege, and whether a written consent from that owner is in the papers. The tool does not draft or amend the by-law. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- List every owner who receives a right, and do not treat a committee minute as that owner's written consent.
- Read section 141 before advising that the resolution type is sufficient. The note is not a substitute for the section.
- Do not draft replacement by-law wording.
- If 2 years have passed since the making, record the conclusive presumption and the date it began.
Sources
- Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) section 143 · 2026-10-22
These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.