Draft non-evidentiary submissions for the NSW PIC, QIRC, WorkSafe Appeals or SACAT
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- Draft a structural outline and non-evidentiary procedural sections from the approved issues table. NSW PIC from 1 January 2026: no evidentiary analysis or fact-based argument (PD PIC 13).
- What the lawyer must review
- Disclose GenAI use or certify non-use in NSW PIC filings (Rules 33A and 33B, from 1 January 2026)
- Keep AI content out of evidentiary material, affidavits, statements and expert reports (PD PIC 13)
- Remember non-disclosure may breach ASCR r 19
- Do not use AI tools that record or transcribe PIC proceedings, including note-taking bots (Rule 133B)
- Verify every citation (see Carrington v TAFE Queensland [2025] QIRC 340; Goodchild v State of Queensland [2025] QIRC 46)
- Name the responsible individual under Qld Supreme Court PD 5 of 2025 (24 September 2025)
- Do the same under Qld District Court PD 12 of 2025
- Written for / version
- Australia versionAU
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Confirm each factual assertion with the witness and original record. Preserve the witness’s own knowledge and words, and check the court’s rules for this document.
- Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
- Check the specialist’s assumptions, qualifications and limits. Obtain the relevant expert or specialist review before relying on a technical conclusion.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.