Compare a goods specification with candidate tariff headings

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the specification, composition, function and invoice description the lawyer supplies, and from the Working Tariff headings the lawyer nominates, set out a table of each candidate heading with the words of that heading, the goods features that meet those words, and the features that do not. Do not choose a classification.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer decides the classification under the Customs Tariff Act 1995, including any interpretative rule, and decides whether a tariff advice is needed before the goods are imported.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceFrom the specification, composition, function and invoice description the lawyer supplies, and from the Working Tariff headings the lawyer nominates, set out a table of each candidate heading with the words of that heading, the goods features that meet those words, and the features that do not. Do not choose a classification.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Open the current Working Tariff and check that every quoted heading is the current wording, not a superseded 2017 page.
  2. Check each goods feature in the table against the specification or invoice, not against the tool summary.
  3. Confirm the table does not state a concluded classification or a duty rate.
  4. Decide whether the goods are new enough, or the heading uncertain enough, to seek a tariff advice before importation.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions