Assemble the claim-chart rows behind infringement particulars
Key facts
- Human involvement
- RedLawyer-led
- How AI is used
- From the claim chart the lawyer has approved, list each asserted claim, each accused product, and the chart row the lawyer has marked, with the page cites already in the chart. Write no sentence of a complaint, an answer, or particulars.
- What the lawyer must review
- Direct infringement is defined in 35 U.S.C. § 271(a): except as otherwise provided in that title, whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention within the United States, or imports it during the term of the patent, infringes the patent. You write the particulars. A paper you present to a federal court is certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, including that the legal contentions are warranted and the factual contentions have evidentiary support. The chart rows are your notes. They are not the pleading.
- Written for / version
- United States versionUS
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Supporting preparation only. Consider narrowly defined preparation support after confirming the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human. |
| Lawyer | Perform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Open each relied-on authority independently. Confirm its existence, current status, proposition and any quotation or pinpoint reference.
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.