Draft a statement of claim, defence or particulars of publication

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
The tool extracts from the publication capture the exact words complained of with their date, headline, byline, placement and any share or download figures, and tabulates each imputation and particular in the pleading the lawyer has written against the passage relied on, the concerns notice and the particulars the court's rules require for each defence pleaded, listing every particular still without a source. It writes no part of the statement of claim, defence or particulars of publication: no draft paragraph, no imputation wording, no precedent text adapted to the matter.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer settles every imputation and particular in their own words and satisfies themselves that each imputation is reasonably capable of arising from the words as published, that the publisher, recipients, dates and extent pleaded match the capture, and that any truth, contextual truth or honest opinion plea has a proper evidentiary basis before filing. They confirm, as the practitioner's certification of reasonable prospects requires, that the case pleaded rests on provable facts, and that the serious harm and limitation positions are pleaded only on the material actually held.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. Potential support includes extracting and organising information. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Calculate operative dates independently from the current rule and actual triggering event. Check exceptions and record the verified deadline.
  2. Check the current court or regulator requirements, prescribed form and attachments for the intended document and filing.
  3. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  4. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions