Capture the publication with URL, time, audience and copies
Key facts
- Human involvement
- GreenLawyer review
- How AI is used
- Build a capture record from the URL, screenshots, archive copies and analytics exports, listing what is still missing.
- What the lawyer must review
- Confirm the capture is complete and dated
- Do not plead a later edit of a live page as the publication
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Build a capture record from the URL, screenshots, archive copies and analytics exports, listing what is still missing. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, verify the evidence, resolve exceptions and approve the final output for its intended use. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defamation claim assessment checklist for an aggrieved person: publication capture, serious harm, limitation and concerns notice timing | Checklist | AI use Yellow | First-instruction checklist for a person who says they have been defamed: capture and first-publication date, standing of a corporation, serious harm evidence, likely defences, the 1-year limitation period and its extensions, and the concerns notice timetable. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.
Sources
Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.