Check AI rules for character references and affidavits in criminal matters
MaintainedLast reviewed
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Map practice notes on AI in evidence.
- What the lawyer must review
- NSW rules limit AI in evidence.
- Written for / version
- Written for Australia
The work product
Forum. Australia
Produce. Check AI rules for character references and affidavits in criminal matters
Have ready. Needham J speech (2025): AI practice notes appendix; Federal Court GPN-AI; The matter instructions and the documents the output will rely on..
Example of the limit. Stop before the result is filed, sent or relied on. NSW rules limit AI in evidence.
Stop and hand it back when
- The cited source is not the instrument that applies to this forum or this date.
- The output states a fact, date, citation, figure or commitment that is not in the instructions or the source.
- The responsible lawyer has not approved the exact output for its intended use.
Sources for this task were checked on 2026-10-10.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Map practice notes on AI in evidence. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Open the cited source and confirm it is the current instrument for this forum and this date.
- NSW rules limit AI in evidence.
- Compare the output with the source and the instructions, including material the output left out.
- The responsible lawyer approves the exact output for its intended use, or sends it back.
Sources
- Needham J speech (2025): AI practice notes appendix · 2026-10-10
- Federal Court GPN-AI · 2026-10-10
Suggested working checks from the linked public sources. Read the source and confirm it applies to this forum and this date. The checks do not approve software or record that the work is done.