Build a disclosure and unused-material tracker
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- From the disclosure lists and the brief, table served / unused / requested items and draft a chase list.
- What the lawyer must review
- Apply the disclosure duties for your side; prosecution and defence differ
- Do not load unused material into a tool without a clearance decision
- Written for / version
- US
Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes preparing preliminary structure or wording. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.
Forms and precedents for this task
| Form or precedent | Kind | AI use | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth prosecution disclosure tracker (CDPP statement) | Checklist | AI use Yellow | Tracker for material in a Commonwealth prosecution against the CDPP Statement on Disclosure. |
| Letter to the prosecution requesting service of the brief of evidence and missing material (NSW Local Court) | Letter | AI use Yellow | Defence letter to the police prosecutor or ODPP after a not guilty plea in the NSW Local Court: asks for the brief on time, lists missing statements, exhibits and recordings, seeks inspection of exhibits, and reserves objections to unserved evidence. |
Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.