Build an environmental-claims evidence table against ACCC greenwashing guidance
Key facts
- Human involvement
- YellowClose supervision
- How AI is used
- Extract carbon-neutral, recycled-content, offset and similar claims, with the client's evidence beside each, against ACL ss 18 and 29 and ACCC greenwashing guidance.
- What the lawyer must review
- Check substantiation and qualifier prominence for each medium
- Note ACCC v Clorox ($8.25m, 7 Feb 2025) is ACL
- Note ASIC v Vanguard ($12.9m, Sept 2024) is s 1041H Corporations Act / s 12DA ASIC Act
- Check sector action and ACCC 2025-26 and 2026-27 priorities
- Written for / version
- Commonwealth versionCth
Rules that apply
The document starts from the task name. Change it if this piece of work is different.
Who does what
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Assistance | Potential support includes extracting and organising information. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope. |
| Lawyer | Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output. |
Checklist
- Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
- Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.