Build a board-oversight evidence table for the climate disclosure

Key facts

Human involvement: YellowClose supervision
How AI is used: From minutes, charters and papers, list climate items the board or committee actually considered, with dates and gaps against the governance heading.
What the lawyer must review: Confirm the board oversight actually happened
Do not treat a generated 'the board considers climate' sentence as evidence
Written for / version: Written for AustraliaUS

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
Role	What they do
Assistance	From minutes, charters and papers, list climate items the board or committee actually considered, with dates and gaps against the governance heading.
Lawyer	Set the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
Verify every relied-on citation, figure and name against the source document.
The responsible lawyer approves the exact version before use.

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedent	Kind	AI use	Summary
Sustainability reporting committee terms of reference (board oversight of the climate statements and directors' declaration)	Policy	AI use Yellow	Terms of reference for a board committee (or a remit added to the audit and risk committee) overseeing the mandatory sustainability report: membership, duties, the evidence directors need for the declaration, sustainability records, protected statements, assurance and the reporting timetable.

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.

Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts. The checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.