Isolate candidate questions of law in a tribunal decision

Key facts

Human involvement
RedLawyer-led
How AI is used
From the tribunal's reasons, extract passages that interpret a statute or decide a fairness point, and label each as a candidate question in the tribunal's words. Do not write a notice of appeal. Do not add facts that are not in the reasons.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer decides whether there is a question of law, whether any error contributed to the decision, and the terms of the notice of appeal. The lawyer writes the notice.
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistanceSupporting preparation only. From the tribunal's reasons, extract passages that interpret a statute or decide a fairness point, and label each as a candidate question in the tribunal's words. Do not write a notice of appeal. Do not add facts that are not in the reasons. The tool writes nothing into the document. Substantive advice, judgement and any restricted content remain with the responsible human.
LawyerPerform the substantive analysis and decisions. Independently check any permitted supporting work and approve the exact output for its intended use.

Checklist

  1. Do not list a disagreement about the facts as a question of law. The guide's examples are procedural fairness and statutory interpretation.
  2. Note that an error of law is not enough if it did not contribute to the decision, and that a clearly correct decision may still lead to dismissal.
  3. Do not add evidence that was not before the tribunal. The guide says new evidence is exceptional.
  4. The tool does not draft the notice of appeal or a notice of cross-appeal.

Sources

These are suggested working checks. Confirm the required checking with the responsible lawyer before work starts; the checking approach does not establish permission to use AI.

Related tasks

Related jurisdictions