Test a record of a regularly conducted activity against Rule 803(6)

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From the record the lawyer has marked, list the Rule 803(6) conditions and leave each one blank: made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, someone with knowledge; kept in the course of a regularly conducted activity of a business, organization, occupation, or calling, whether or not for profit; making the record was a regular practice of that activity; the conditions are shown by the custodian or another qualified witness, or by a certification that complies with Rule 902(11) or (12) or a statute permitting certification; and the opponent does not show that the source or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness. Do not decide that the record is admissible. Do not prepare the certification.
What the lawyer must review
The lawyer decides whether the exception is met. Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) is the hearsay exception for a record of an act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis if those five conditions are met. The certification cross-references were not opened beyond Rule 902's electronic routes, so no certification is drafted. Rule 802 still bars hearsay unless a statute, these rules, or another Supreme Court rule provides otherwise. The tool does not decide admission.
Written for / version
United States versionUS

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistancePotential support includes organising research leads. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Review operative clauses in the complete document, including definitions, cross-references, schedules and inconsistencies with the instructions.
  2. Confirm that the wording reflects the client’s instructions and contains no unintended admission, concession or commitment. Check the recipient and tone.
  3. Verify the applicable jurisdiction and the version of each relevant law, rule or instrument in force at the material time.
  4. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  5. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions