Flag candidate synthetic or altered items in a production set

Key facts

Human involvement
YellowClose supervision
How AI is used
From a permitted production, list items with missing metadata, inconsistent fonts or reuse patterns, and a sample for human review.
What the lawyer must review
  • Spot-check pivotal documents
  • Treat a generated 'synthetic' flag as a question, not a finding
Written for / version
US

Open a jurisdiction version of this task to see which instruments apply: US

Who does what

Who does what
RoleWhat they do
AssistancePotential support includes identifying points for review. Confirm the tool’s capability and permitted scope.
LawyerSet the scope, supervise the work closely, verify every part relied on, resolve omissions and exceptions, and approve the exact output.

Checklist

  1. Confirm the output against the client’s instructions and the complete relevant source material, including omissions or contradictions.
  2. Resolve exceptions and record the responsible lawyer’s approval of the exact output and intended use.

Forms and precedents for this task

Forms and precedents for this task
Form or precedentKindAI useSummary
Federal Court checklist: generative AI and evidentiary materialChecklistAI use YellowA checklist for evidentiary material in the Federal Court where generative AI may have been used: when the practice note requires disclosure, what that disclosure must say, and what must not be put into a tool.
Production-set log for candidate synthetic or altered mediaFormAI use YellowLog for marking items in a production, brief or client upload that need a lawyer's eye: missing native files, platform AI labels, inconsistent metadata, or a witness account that does not match the item.
NSW gate before compelled or suppressed material enters a generative AI programChecklistAI use YellowA gate, under Supreme Court Practice Note SC Gen 23 paragraph 9A, before subpoenaed, suppressed, or compulsion material is entered into any generative AI program, including a closed one.
Response sheet: suspected non-consensual intimate deepfakeChecklistAI use YellowInternal steps when an image or video in a matter shows, or appears to show, a person in an intimate deepfake: do not copy it further, do not put it into a public AI tool, and record the eSafety and safety options the lawyer discussed.

Signed-in accounts can read the full text of each one. All precedents.

Related tasks

Related tools

Related jurisdictions