AI hallucination cases in Australia
Wills and Aiadaui v Wilson
[2025] VCAT 1022
[2023] VSC 431 is Koronczyk v Victorian Small Business Commissioner, which these reasons discuss. It is not a citation of this decision. The judgment heading is Wills v Wilson (Building and Property) [2025] VCAT 1022 (14 November 2025).
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal |
| Jurisdiction | Victoria |
| Date | 14 November 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2025] VCAT 1022 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicants cited a case allegedly called 'Reynolds' with a citation that actually corresponds to a different case; Tribunal concluded this was part of an AI hallucination/misattribution. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicants relied on a non-existent section of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic); Tribunal found the cited section does not exist and concluded it was an AI-generated fabrication.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Victoria · Court AI practice notes