AI hallucination cases in Australia
Vivek Singha v. Metal Manufactures
[2025] FWC 2817
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Fair Work Commission |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 8 October 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2025] FWC 2817 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Commission and Costs Applicant identified that the citation 'Corey v Metro Trains [2013] FWC 7893' does not exist; court concluded it was likely AI-generated. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Respondent relied on an incomplete/misleading citation 'Murray Hobson v Murrin Murrin [2024]'; the Commission noted the apparent correct reference is Murray Hobson v Murrin Murrin Operations Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 157 and that the case did not support the respondent's submissions. || Fabrica
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes