Valu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)

OBITER

The Applicant’s legal representative (ALR) filed submissions that contained citations to Federal Court of Australia cases that do not exist, and alleged quotes from the Tribunal that did not exist (hallucinations). The ALR stated that they had used AI to identify Australian cases, but it had provided them with non‑existent case law ([10]). Skaros J held that, given the strong public interest in referring this sort of conduct to the regulatory authority in NSW, and given the increased use of gene

The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.