AI hallucination cases in Australia
Sky Gardens
[2025] QBCCMCmr 373
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Queensland BCCMC |
| Jurisdiction | Queensland |
| Date | 29 October 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Adverse costs order for "misconceived and without substance" application |
| Citation | [2025] QBCCMCmr 373 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited multiple authorities; adjudicator found several of the cited cases do not exist and at least one 'does not appear to exist at all'. || False Quotes: Case Law | Applicant relied on existing cases but the adjudicator found two cases 'do not say the things the applicant asserts' (misstated holdings/quotes). || Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicant cited a case under a different name and attributed quoted text not present in that decision. || Fabricated: Exhibit
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Queensland · Court AI practice notes