AI hallucination cases in Australia
RYJZ and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation)
[2026] ARTA 182
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Administrative Review Tribunal |
| Jurisdiction | Not recorded |
| Date | 12 February 2026 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] ARTA 182 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant relied on 'Cheung v FCT [2021] AATA 3851'; Tribunal and Commissioner found no record of that case and treated it as a fabricated citation, noting possible AI use. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant relied on 'Dwyer v FCT [2018] AATA 456'; Tribunal and Commissioner found no record of that case and treated it as a fabricated citation, noting possible AI use.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Court AI practice notes