AI hallucination cases in Australia
Rowe v National Australia Bank Ltd
[2025] SASC 50
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Court of South Australia |
| Jurisdiction | South Australia |
| Date | 17 April 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2025] SASC 50 |
Summary from the trackers
OBITER
The litigants in person (Applicants) used AI in their written and oral submissions ([37]). The Applicants relied on three High Court decisions and a NSW Court of Appeal decision. These decisions do not exist and are likely AI hallucinations (B Doyle J).
Court AI rules
Sources
- OBITER AI Hallucination Cases: Australia
- thomsonreuters.com
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- anzlaw.thomsonreuters.com
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · South Australia · Court AI practice notes