AI hallucination cases in Australia
Rafi Najib v MSS Security Pty Limited
[2025] FWC 1893
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Fair Work Commission |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 2 July 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Application dismissed |
| Citation | [2025] FWC 1893 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Applicant relied on legal principles and cases not consonant with current authority to argue forced resignation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited non-existent cases to support constructive dismissal; the court noted some cited cases 'do not exist'. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicant provided incorrect case citations; the court stated some cases were 'incorrectly cited'.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes