AI hallucination cases in Australia
QWYN and Commissioner of Taxation
[2025] ARTA 83
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Administrative Review Tribunal of Australia |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 5 February 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Copilot |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | The Tribunal affirmed the decision under review, rejecting the applicant's submissions based on the AI-generated content. |
| Citation | [2025] ARTA 83 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
"The Applicant engaged the Copilot [Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence product] in a range of probing questions pertaining to superannuation and taxation matters, upon which in part, it returned the following responses:The Explanatory Memorandum to the Taxation Laws Amendment (Superannuation) Bill 1992, which introduced the new regime taxing superannuation benefits, states in paragraph 2.20 that “the Bill will provide a tax rebate of 15 per cent for disability superannuation pensions. This will
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes