AI hallucination cases in Australia
QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)
[2026] ARTA 874
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Administrative Review Tribunal |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 22 May 2026 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] ARTA 874 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'PLSM v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4156' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'EEZK v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] AATA 1909' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'Hyde v National Dis
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes