AI hallucination cases in Australia
Pravesh Koonjah v GPC Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
[2026] FWC 2680
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Fair Work Commission |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 23 July 2026 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] FWC 2680 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
False Quotes: Case Law | Applicant cited Ayub v NSW Trains [2016] FWCFB 5500 para [7] for a proposition the paragraph does not state; court identified this as a sign of AI hallucination. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicant cited B, C & D v Australian Postal Corporation [2013] FWCFB 6191 as supporting a point about procedural fairness, but the decision does not stand for that proposition. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicant cited 'King v Freshmore (Vic) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 930' for relianc
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes