AI hallucination cases in Australia
Moore (Scheme Administrator) v Ochkit Pty Ltd (No. 3)
[2026] QSC 15
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Court of Queensland |
| Jurisdiction | Queensland |
| Date | 17 February 2026 |
| Who used AI | Not recorded |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | Not recorded |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] QSC 15 |
Summary from the trackers
OBITER
The self‑represented litigants (Respondents) used artificial intelligence in their submissions, which resulted in hallucinated and irrelevant case references (see [54], [61]). Treston J said (at [61]): ‘… those submissions were substantially AI generated containing references which were incorrect, and cases which did not exist. […] Whilst it is understandable that self-represented people find complex legal matters difficult to litigate in superior courts, self-represented litigants must neverthe
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Queensland · Court AI practice notes