AI hallucination cases in Australia
Leytcorp v Mimbim Enterprises
[2025] ATMO 264
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Trade Marks Office |
| Jurisdiction | Not recorded |
| Date | 22 December 2025 |
| Who used AI | Lawyer |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2025] ATMO 264 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Removal Applicant's written submissions referenced several non-existent case authorities and attendant non-existent propositions of law; delegate characterised these references as AI hallucinations arising from the representative's materials.
Court AI rules
No court AI rule is linked for this forum.
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Court AI practice notes