Khoury v Kooij

OBITER

Litigant in person’s (Applicant’s) use of generative AI that produced hallucinations: citing false names and cases, fabricating quotes in written submissions, and referring to a non‑existent legislative sub‑paragraph ([15]–[17]).

Charlotin database

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant relied on a case name (redacted) purportedly reported at [2017] QSC 105 and quoted from it; the Court could not find the cited name or the quoted passage. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Applicant cited Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka v His Eminence Petar [2008] HCA 42 and relied on paragraph [123] for a proposition; the case exists but paragraph [123] does not support the point advanced. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant referred to two further cas

The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.