AI hallucination cases in Australia
Huang v Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd
[2025] NSWCATAP 271
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) |
| Jurisdiction | New South Wales |
| Date | 30 October 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2025] NSWCATAP 271 |
Summary from the trackers
OBITER
The self‑represented litigant (Appellant) submitted Amended Grounds of Appeal. The Tribunal found that they had used generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in their preparation, as evident from the document and conceded by them ([123]). The Tribunal observed (at [124]) that paragraph 16 of NCAT Procedural Direction 7 (Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence) requires that, where generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been used in preparing submissions or summaries, parties must i
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
- OBITER AI Hallucination Cases: Australia
- AustLII
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · New South Wales · Court AI practice notes