AI hallucination cases in Australia
Handa & Mallick
[2024] FedCFamC2F 957
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 19 July 2024 |
| Who used AI | Not recorded |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | Not recorded |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2024] FedCFamC2F 957 |
Summary from the trackers
OBITER
The solicitor appearing as agent tendered a list of authorities (four case citations) that could not be located by Justice A. Humphreys. The solicitor indicated that the list had been prepared using the legal software package LEAP, which uses artificial intelligence (see [6]–[7]). Her Honour ordered (at [10]) that the practitioner be given an opportunity to explain why their conduct in tendering the list of authorities should not be referred to the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes