AI hallucination cases in Australia
Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2)
[2026] NSWSC 373
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Court of New South Wales |
| Jurisdiction | New South Wales |
| Date | 5 June 2026 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] NSWSC 373 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Documents purportedly evidencing the Fund's lending policies were created after litigation and were 'ostensibly created by Artificial Intelligence', i.e. AI‑generated/ex post fabrications relied on as evidence. || Fabricated: Case Law | Written submissions by Mr Hunt contained hallucinations about legal authorities (fabricated or inaccurate case citations) that went beyond his pleaded case; the court treated those authority citations as unreliable.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · New South Wales · Court AI practice notes