AI hallucination cases in Australia
Candice Dias v Angle Auto Finance
Citation pending. The trackers have not recorded a medium-neutral citation.
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Fair Work Commission |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 20 January 2025 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | citation pending |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | in relation to Kenny v Business Council of Australia [2015] FCAFC 75 it had been unable to find a case of that name and citation, with the citation being for a different case, || Misrepresented: Case Law | in relation to Yorke v Lucas [2015] FWCFB 6592, there did not appear to be a decision of the Full Bench of the Commission with that name or citation and while there was a High Court case with that name, it dealt with accessorial liability under the Trade Practices Act; |
The tracker extract ends in the middle of a sentence.
Court AI rules
Sources
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes