AI hallucination cases in Australia
Application by Pennisi
[2026] FWC 352
| Detail | What the trackers record |
|---|---|
| Court | Fair Work Commission |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth |
| Date | 5 February 2026 |
| Who used AI | Self-represented |
| Tool named by the trackers | Not named |
| Sanction for the AI use | No professional sanction |
| Outcome | Not recorded |
| Citation | [2026] FWC 352 |
Summary from the trackers
Charlotin database
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant relied on an authority cited as Iwasaki v Hays [2019] FWCFB 1761; the Commission found that this citation does not exist and declined to treat it as supporting exceptional circumstances.
Court AI rules
Sources
- AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin (CC BY 4.0)
- Judgment copy cited by the Charlotin database
All AI hallucination cases in Australia · Commonwealth · Court AI practice notes