---
title: "Mary (DEA Technology Pty Ltd (Mary Technology))"
url: "https://ailawframework.com/software/mary-technology"
type: "software_profile"
site: "AI Law Framework"
id: "mary-technology"
vendor: "DEA Technology Pty Ltd (Mary Technology)"
category: "Legal-specific"
segment: "eDiscovery and litigation"
confidence: "medium"
last_reviewed: "2026-09-20"
---

# Mary (DEA Technology Pty Ltd (Mary Technology))

> Australian litigation tool that reads a matter's documents and builds a checkable factual record (people, dates, events, gaps and contradictions) from which timelines and work product can be drawn.

Canonical page: https://ailawframework.com/software/mary-technology  
Last reviewed: 2026-09-20

Site index for agents: https://ailawframework.com/llms.txt

Plan covered: Mary AU SaaS (au.marytechnology.com) for factual-record, chronology and verification workflows. Review Enterprise contracts, MCP connections to Claude/ChatGPT/Copilot/Harvey, and any non-AU tenancy separately.

## Capabilities

- Chronology building
- eDiscovery document review
- Document summarisation
- Agentic workflows

## Key facts

| Fact | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Deployment | SaaS |
| Hosting regions | Australia |
| Australian region | Yes |
| Model providers | Microsoft Azure |
| Training on customer content | No |
| Retention | Security page: customer data including uploaded documents, matter content, prompts and outputs is never used to train AI models; data is retained only as long as necessary and purged in accordance with legal requirements. No numbered day count is published. |
| Integrations | Actionstep, MCP (Claude, ChatGPT; Copilot and Harvey listed as coming soon) |
| Legal content coverage | Mary processes the firm's matter documents; it is not a licensed primary-law research database. |
| Pricing | AU pricing page: Start $500/mo (2.5k credits, $0.20/page, rollover to 7,500); Growth $1,000/mo; Business $2,000/mo; PAYG 30c/page; Enterprise custom. A free join path is linked. Terms allow the subscription fee to change at the next period; termination by 7 days' notice and non-renewal. |
| Australian presence | Yes. DEA Technology Pty Ltd, Sydney (477 Pitt Street). AU login at au.marytechnology.com. Terms are intended for residents of Australia and governed by NSW law. Privacy policy addresses APPs and OAIC complaints. |
| Website | https://www.marytechnology.com/au/ |

## What the research found

| Topic | Status | Finding | Open question | Sources |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AU SaaS plans | Public claim only | This profile covers the Australian Mary SaaS (au.marytechnology.com) used to build a matter factual record, chronologies and related work product. Enterprise terms, MCP to third-party assistants, and any non-AU site should be reviewed separately. Some accounts may have a separate Software Licensing Agreement that amends the website Terms. | Confirm we are on the AU tenancy, which plan (Start/Growth/Business/Enterprise), whether MCP is enabled, and whether a signed SLA replaces the website Terms. | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary AU pricing](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/pricing); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| Australian SaaS | Public claim only | The product is offered as a web SaaS with an Australian login host. Privacy policy names Microsoft Azure as the LLM provider and 'tenanted AI services'. The Azure region is not named on the security page. On-premises is not offered on the pages reviewed. | Which Azure region stores documents, prompts, outputs and backups for the AU tenancy? | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) |
| Factual record, chronology, MCP | Public claim only | Mary reads matter documents and builds a factual record showing what was processed, unused, unprocessed, contradicted or missing. Timelines, issue analysis and financial analysis are described as built from that record. MCP exposes the record to Claude and ChatGPT (Copilot and Harvey coming soon). | Which workflows (chronology, gap analysis, drafting, financial analysis, MCP) will be enabled, and which remain beta? | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Australian operator and APP wording | Public claim only | DEA Technology Pty Ltd operates from Sydney. Terms: service intended for residents of Australia; NSW law and courts. Privacy policy cites APPs 12 and 13 and OAIC complaints, and states personal information will not be disclosed outside Australia unless the individual expressly requests. Azure LLM processing location is not reconciled with that sentence. | Does Azure inference for our AU tenancy occur in Australia, and if not, how does that sit with the privacy policy's overseas-disclosure wording? | [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions); [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) |
| Published credit and page pricing | Public claim only | AU pricing lists Start/Growth/Business monthly fees, per-page rates, credit pools and PAYG 30c/page. Currency is shown as $ only. Terms: fees may be varied from the next subscription period; members may terminate with 7 days' notice and by not renewing. Enterprise is custom. FAQ answers on the pricing page did not render in the scrape. | Confirm the currency, overage when credits are exhausted, annual versus monthly, and whether Enterprise replaces the website liability cap. | [Mary AU pricing](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/pricing); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| Actionstep and MCP | Public claim only | A blog describes an Actionstep integration: an administrator grants Mary access, then files can be imported into a Mary matter. MCP connects Claude and ChatGPT to the Mary record. SSO/SCIM and Word/Outlook add-ins were not documented on the pages reviewed. | Demonstrate Actionstep scopes, SSO/MFA, and which MCP tools can read or write the factual record. | [Mary now integrates with Actionstep](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/blog/mary-now-integrates-with-actionstep); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Support contact | Public claim only | Privacy and security pages give support@marytechnology.com and a Sydney street address. Enterprise is marketed with dedicated support. No public severity SLA was found. | What are response times for the AU tenancy and the security-incident reporting path? | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary AU pricing](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/pricing) |
| Head-to-head claim without a published study | Public claim only | The AU homepage states '0 of 9 litigators preferred Mary's output in a head-to-head matter review at a global law firm' in the scrape (the numeric counters also rendered as 0+). A white paper argues verification should be designed into legal AI. No downloadable methods paper with sample and scores was reviewed. | Provide the head-to-head protocol and results, and allow us to test Mary on a known matter of ours. | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/) |
| Chronology and factual record | Public claim only | The product is built to turn evidentiary documents into structured facts and a case chronology, surfacing contradictions, gaps and unproduced references. Terms require a qualified legal professional to review and approve all outputs before action. It is not a court-filing generator. | Which of our chronology, issue-analysis and first-draft tasks will use Mary, and which (affidavits, advice, filings) stay out of scope? | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary AU pricing](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/pricing); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| Australian firms and client consent | Not confirmed | Mary holds confidential matter documents. Several Australian firms are shown as logos. MCP can send the factual record into Claude or ChatGPT, which is a further disclosure. No per-client AI exclusion control was documented. | Can we disable MCP and exports per matter, and what Azure-region description can we give clients? | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Microsoft Azure LLMs | Public claim only | The privacy policy states Mary uses LLMs provided by Microsoft Azure and 'tenanted AI services' so client information is isolated and not used for model training without explicit consent. The Azure model family and region are not named. MCP adds Claude and ChatGPT as separate processors if enabled. | Which Azure OpenAI (or other) models and regions process our tenancy, and are MCP providers in the signed chain? | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| No published subprocessor list | Not confirmed | Azure is named as the LLM provider. Actionstep and MCP tools are optional. No dated subprocessor schedule, notice period or objection right was found. Vanta trust centre is linked but was not inspected in this review. | Provide the current subprocessor list (Azure, Actionstep, MCP hosts, hosting, support) with countries and 30-day notice/objection rights. | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) |
| No training on customer content | Public claim only | Security page: customer data including uploaded documents, matter content, prompts and outputs is never used to train AI models. Terms clause 19 and the privacy policy repeat tenanted Azure services and no external use for model training without explicit consent. | Confirm the signed clause covers embeddings, logs and MCP-shared record content, and that Azure's terms match (no training, defined retention). | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions); [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) |
| Consent carve-out for training | Public claim only | Privacy policy says client data is not used for model training or development without explicit consent. That implies a consent path could enable training. No description of in-product feedback buttons was found. | Is there any feedback, evaluation or 'improve Mary' use of our content, and is it off unless we consent in writing? | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) |
| Retention 'as long as necessary' | Public claim only | Security page: data is retained only as long as necessary and securely purged in accordance with best practices and legal requirements. No day count for prompts, outputs, Azure abuse-monitoring or backups is published. | Provide a numbered retention schedule for documents, the factual record, prompts, outputs, logs and Azure copies, including administrator deletion. | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) |
| Purge claimed; no certificate | Not confirmed | Security page refers to secure purge. Privacy policy points to encryption and removal requests. Terms do not state a post-termination deletion period or certificate. Termination is by 7 days' notice and account closure. | On termination or matter close, what is deleted from Mary and Azure, within how many days, with what certificate? | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions); [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) |
| Authorised personnel access | Public claim only | Privacy policy: access to client data is limited to authorised personnel directly involved in the document-generation process. Security page: background checks, access reviews, MDM. Terms: tenanted services so confidential information is not accessible for model training or by unauthorised personnel. No customer-visible access log was described. | Is support access per-ticket with our approval, logged to us, and will you notify us of legal process seeking matter content? | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| SSO not documented | Not confirmed | AU login exists. Access-control language is general. SAML/SCIM, matter ethical walls and MFA enforcement were not specified on the security page. MCP expands who can read the record. | Do you support SAML/OIDC SSO, MFA enforcement and matter-level permissions, including for MCP users? | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Encryption claimed without algorithms | Public claim only | Security page: client data is encrypted throughout its lifecycle; annual penetration tests and continuous vulnerability assessments. Algorithms, TLS version and CMK were not stated. | Confirm TLS 1.2+ and AES-256 (or equivalent) in transit and at rest, including Azure and backups, and whether CMK is available. | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) |
| Vanta trust centre; badges not transcribed | Public claim only | Security page links an Australian Vanta trust centre and refers to internationally recognised controls and independently tested safeguards. The badge image was not transcribed into named SOC 2 or ISO certificates in the scrape. Reports were not downloaded. | Which current SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 reports cover Mary AU, and do they include Azure generative features? | [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) |
| Website Terms; NSW law; narrow liability | Public claim only | Public Terms bind use of the website and Mary unless a Software Licensing Agreement amends them. NSW law and exclusive NSW courts; mediation in Sydney. Total liability 'will not exceed the resupply of the Services'. Outputs must be reviewed by a qualified legal professional. No separate public DPA. IP in the platform is reserved to DEA Technology; customer ownership of outputs is not clearly assigned. | Will Enterprise sign a DPA with APP flow-down, output ownership, a meaningful liability cap for confidentiality/data breach, and confirm the website Terms do not control? | [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| APP overseas-disclosure wording versus Azure | Not confirmed | Privacy policy section 8: personal information will not be disclosed to recipients outside Australia unless you expressly request. The same policy names Microsoft Azure LLMs. Azure processing may be outside Australia depending on region. MCP to Claude/ChatGPT would be a further overseas disclosure if those tools are US-hosted. | Name every country of storage and inference for our AU tenancy, including Azure and any MCP provider, in writing. | [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Breach process pointed to privacy policy | Not confirmed | Terms say the privacy policy addresses processes for Mary security breaches. The scraped privacy policy does not state a numbered notification period or NDB cooperation clause. | Within how many hours of discovering a suspected incident affecting our matter data will you notify us, and will you support an NDB assessment? | [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions); [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) |
| Terms change on publication | Public claim only | Terms may be updated by publishing on the website, with reasonable endeavours to notify; changes take immediate effect. Subscription fees may change from the next period. MCP providers (Copilot, Harvey) are listed as coming soon. | Will Enterprise freeze terms during the term, and notify us before adding MCP providers or changing Azure models/regions? | [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| 7-day termination; export not specified | Not confirmed | A member may terminate with 7 days' notice, by not renewing, and by closing accounts. No bulk-export format, post-termination window or deletion certificate is in the public Terms. | How do we export the factual record, chronologies, source links and audit logs on exit, and when is remaining data deleted from Mary and Azure? | [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |
| Actionstep and MCP | Not confirmed | Actionstep import requires an administrator to grant Mary access to firm files. MCP lets Claude and ChatGPT work from the Mary record. Each is a disclosure of matter facts to another system. | What Actionstep scopes are requested, what does MCP send to Claude/ChatGPT, and how do we disable both without a ticket? | [Mary now integrates with Actionstep](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/blog/mary-now-integrates-with-actionstep); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Record built from uploaded matter files | Public claim only | Mary is described as reading the matter's documents and accounting for what was processed versus missing. Open-web search as a Mary feature was not found. MCP-connected ChatGPT or Claude may have their own web tools. | Confirm Mary does not call the open web on our matters, and how MCP assistants are blocked from web search using our record. | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| MCP actions in third-party tools | Not confirmed | MCP lets lawyers invoke Mary from Claude or ChatGPT. What those tools may do with the record (copy out, email, browse) depends on the assistant, not only on Mary. In-app, Mary writes the factual record as it processes documents. | Which MCP tools are read-only versus able to export or modify the record, and how do we freeze MCP immediately? | [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) |
| Checkable record; contractual review duty | Public claim only | The product is designed so every entry shows whether it is supported, contradicted or unconfirmed and can be opened to the source. Terms clause 11(d): all outputs must be reviewed and approved by a qualified legal professional before any action; Mary is not a substitute for legal advice and accuracy is not guaranteed. | Can we require named sign-off before a chronology or analysis leaves Mary, with an export of who verified which entries? | [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/); [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) |

## Notes

Could not verify: Azure region, named SOC 2/ISO reports (Vanta linked, not opened), DPA, subprocessor list, SSO/SCIM, numbered retention/deletion, and NDB hours. Privacy policy overseas-disclosure wording may conflict with Azure/MCP. Website Terms cap liability at resupply of the service — Enterprise should negotiate. Do not treat homepage '0 of 9 litigators' as a scored study. Founded year inferred from 2023 startup award, not a filing.

## Sources

- [Mary Technology AU — home](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary AU data security](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/data-security) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary AU pricing](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/pricing) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [About Mary Technology](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/company) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary Terms & Conditions](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/terms-conditions) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary MCP](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/mcp) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary now integrates with Actionstep](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/blog/mary-now-integrates-with-actionstep) (checked 2026-09-20)
- [Mary AU privacy policy](https://www.marytechnology.com/au/privacy-policy) (checked 2026-09-20)

A product profile is research to support questions. It does not approve a product for any firm. Public product information supports questions; it does not approve a product for your firm. Verify the exact plan, settings and signed terms.